Last week I discussed the Tiger Woods scandal and how he was able to hold strong to his Nike endorsement. Despite the infidelity taking place in his personal life, his professional life was held to a different standard.
The news over the past week has been swirling with the Maria Sharapova scandal and her drug use coming to light. The use of drugs for a professional athlete is something that is career shattering. Because of this, her endorsements are in deep waters.
The difference between the Woods scandal and the Sharapova scandal boils down to the affect on their game. Having multiple affairs is frowned upon in society, but at the end of the day the actual act has little to no affect on Woods’ game (though many could argue it made him play worse, but that is simply speculation). Taking drugs to improve your game, set you above other players, directly affects your game as well as your athletic status.
Sharapova has served as an icon to tennis players around the world. She has inspired young girls to pick up a racket and push themselves to become the best they can be. But companies like Nike cannot justify supporting an athlete who has used drugs to enhance their game. Nike is a brand committed to athletic performance. Performance comes from hard work and endurance (and possibly a pair of AirMax’s), not from drug use.
I completely back Nike in their choice to suspend Sharapova’s contract. It’s nice to see a company putting athletic ethics before a dollar sign, and placing the game first.